My photo
. its best to believe in any religion (monolithic / divine) openly and practice it ? its good not to believe in any religion; openly and declare it ? its worst to carry a tag of religion and do not believe or do not practice it completely or carry secret beliefs to display differently ? its worst to call any religion evil, it doesn't over rule to express any universal evil (which is accepted or may be proved) in any believer of any religion at an appropriate forum ? its good to accept any universal good (which is accepted or may be proved) expressed by any religion believer or even non-believer of any religion ? And the war remains between evil and good ?. . . For introduction read other posts as well: Individuals are cordially invited to read and watch. https://vimeo.com/channels/814969 https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLW00rTKFywFlrkhDRGqVyoVlrCLwNaqFi

Tuesday, November 22, 2011

Enemies of a Peaceful Society

In the name of Allahاللہ (THE GOD) ,
the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful

Enemies of a Peaceful Society (اسلامی معاشرہ)
Which thought is planning, initiating, conducting, financing, promoting and silent over acts of terrorism (killing innocents, blackmailing, torture: physical/mental/cyber)?






Non Religionistic (denial of Only One God-non practice of any religion openly)

Non Globalistic (non belief in Global Peaceful Human Society)

Hegemonistic or Ballistic (belief of ultimate god as: State, Government, Institution, Organisation, person or any other form of fanatic hegemony over human beings)

Goalistic (achieving goal by any means without any defined code of conduct)

Denial of Prophet hood, Prophets and the Last Prophet (peace be upon all)

Denial of life after death day of the resurrection and the judgement day

Denial of divine revelation and the last revelation

All above

Non of above

My Choice: The thought (followers) mentioned above

Translation by Pickthal (others as well)

Translation is not the substitute of the original text (Quranic Arabic). Do not quote or take the text as fact against any one, only meant for the self analysis not generalization or specifying any meaning of any verse in scholarly or literally sense but at the spot under specific circumstances.

change or variations in links may be considered positively once do not work  

No comments:

Post a Comment